What Is a What-If and Checklist Review?

What-If and Checklist Reviews are two essential risk assessment tools used in the process industry to identify hazards and improve operational safety.

What Is a What-If Review?

A What-If Review is a creative brainstorming technique where a cross-functional team explores potential risks by asking hypothetical “what-if” questions. These questions target possible failures, human errors, or external events that could lead to unsafe conditions. The team evaluates the likelihood and severity of each scenario, identifies existing safeguards, and recommends risk reduction measures.

This flexible approach is especially useful in:

  • Early design stages

  • Process modifications

  • Uncovering less obvious hazards

What Is a Checklist Review?

A Checklist Review is a structured assessment that uses a predefined list of safety questions or criteria based on:

  • Industry standards

  • Regulatory requirements (e.g., OSHA PSM)

  • Lessons from past incidents

The review team systematically goes through each checklist item to ensure that all critical aspects of process safety are addressed. This method is ideal for routine evaluations, audits, and compliance verification.

What-If and Checklist Reviews

Why Are What-If and Checklist Reviews Important?

Using both What-If and Checklist Reviews ensures a comprehensive and proactive approach to hazard identificationand risk management.

Key benefits:

  • Identifies both common and rare hazards

  • Encourages broad team input and critical thinking

  • Ensures systematic coverage of safety elements

  • Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., OSHA, EPA)

  • Provides a clear path to risk mitigation and safety improvement

Man working on a site needing hazard identification and assessment.

Get in touch

Any questions or concerns? To learn more about our services, please call +1 (346) 462-3838 or email info@primeprocesssafety.com.

How to Conduct a What-If and Checklist Review

  1. Form a Multidisciplinary Team – Include experts in engineering, operations, safety, and maintenance.

  2. Define Scope & Objectives – Focus the review on specific processes or systems.

  3. Select or Customize Checklists – Align with industry standards and facility-specific needs.

  4. Facilitate What-If Sessions – Brainstorm scenarios involving equipment failure, human error, and external impacts.

  5. Assess Risks & Consequences – Analyze severity and likelihood for each scenario or checklist item.

  6. Evaluate Existing Safeguards – Document current controls and their effectiveness.

  7. Recommend Additional Safeguards – Propose improvements where risk levels are too high.

  8. Document the Review – Create detailed reports of findings, recommendations, and action plans.

  9. Assign Actions & Responsibilities – Ensure follow-up and accountability.

  10. Update Regularly – Revisit reviews after changes or incidents.

  11. Train Personnel – Educate your team on outcomes and new safety measures.

  12. Monitor Implementation – Track progress and revalidate effectiveness.

Why Perform What-If and Checklist Reviews?

Implementing What-If and Checklist Reviews helps you:

  • Proactively identify and control hazards

  • Improve safety culture and awareness

  • Prevent incidents and downtime

  • Comply with OSHA PSM, EPA RMP, and other standards

  • Drive continuous improvement in your process safety management system

What Information Is Needed Before Conducting a What-If Review?

A What-If Review depends on the information the team brings to the table. Before the meeting, collect current records showing how the process is designed and maintained. Check document dates and confirm that drawings match the equipment in the field before gathering the following materials for the review:

  • Process flow diagrams (PFDs): Show the sequence of operations and material flow.
  • Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs): Identify valves, instruments, alarms, interlocks, and relief devices.
  • Safety Data Sheets (SDS): Describe material hazards and handling precautions.
  • Equipment data: Record design limits, operating ranges, manufacturer specifications, and maintenance requirements.
  • Operating procedures: Include startup, shutdown, cleaning, maintenance, and emergency tasks.
  • Incident records: Gather relevant failures and previous investigation findings.
  • Laboratory results: Include test data relevant to the materials in use, such as dust explosibility or thermal stability results.

The team should also know what has changed since the last review. These include new ingredients, altered batch sizes, revised operating temperatures, or modified equipment, as they can change hazards. A process safety consultant can help identify missing information and determine what needs verification before the review proceeds. A risk assessment checklist review should use site-specific, current information, not an old checklist treated as proof that every hazard has been considered. Record assumptions and unresolved questions so they can be checked by the people responsible for the process.

Pricing for a What-If Review depends on factors such as process complexity, facility size, review scope and the documentation available. Prime Process Safety Center assesses each project individually and provides a quote based on its requirements. Contact us today to discuss your needs and request a tailored estimate.

Why Choose Prime Process Safety Center

At Prime Process Safety Center, we provide expert-led What-If and Checklist Reviews that align with your operations and safety goals.

What Sets Us Apart:

  • Deep Expertise in Process Safety

  • Skilled Facilitation of What-If Sessions

  • Customized Safety Checklists

  • Systematic, Proven Methodologies

  • Clear, Actionable Documentation

  • Focus on Compliance and Risk Reduction

  • Ongoing Support and Training

People using a laptop for hazard identification and assessment.

Get A Free Quote

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are What-If and Checklist Reviews?

These are structured risk assessment techniques used to identify and analyze potential hazards in industrial processes. What-If Reviews involve brainstorming potential hazardous scenarios, while Checklist Reviews use predefined lists of questions to assess safety.

2. Why are What-If and Checklist Reviews important in process safety?

They are critical for identifying potential risks and ensuring that all aspects of process safety are considered, helping to prevent accidents and ensure compliance with safety regulations.

3. How often should What-If and Checklist Reviews be conducted?

Regular reviews are recommended, typically annually, or whenever there are significant changes to processes, equipment, or regulations.

4. Who should be involved in these reviews?

A multidisciplinary team including process engineers, safety professionals, and operational staff should be involved to provide diverse perspectives and expertise.

5. What kind of training is required for conducting these reviews?

Personnel should be trained in risk assessment techniques, process safety management, and specific procedures relevant to the industry.

6. How do What-If Reviews differ from Checklist Reviews?

What-If Reviews are more open-ended and brainstorming-based, while Checklist Reviews are structured and based on specific pre-defined criteria.

7. Can these reviews be used for regulatory compliance?

Yes, they help in identifying potential non-compliances with safety regulations and standards, aiding in maintaining regulatory compliance.

8. What is the role of a facilitator in these reviews?

A facilitator guides the review process, ensures that all relevant hazards are considered, and that discussions stay focused and productive.

9. How are the findings from these reviews documented?

Findings are typically documented in detailed reports outlining identified hazards, risk levels, and recommended mitigation measures.

10. Can What-If and Checklist Reviews be integrated with other risk assessment methods?

Yes, they are often used in conjunction with other methods like HAZOP for a more comprehensive risk assessment.

11. Should drawings be checked against the equipment in the field?

Yes. Walk through the process area with site personnel and compare drawings with equipment. Record differences, such as missing instruments or changed pipe routes. Resolve discrepancies before relying on the drawings.

12. How should the team handle information that cannot be confirmed?

List uncertainty and set a follow-up date. Do not treat an assumed operating limit or safeguard as confirmed. Record conclusions that depend on unverified information.

13. Do laboratory results apply to every material from the same process?

Not automatically. Properties vary with formulation, particle size, moisture, and processing history. Confirm that the tested sample represents the material and conditions under review. Further testing may be needed if it differs from current production material.

14. What should be included when a process has several operating modes?

Provide information for normal production, startup, shutdown, cleaning, maintenance, and temporary operation. Hazards can change between modes, especially when equipment is opened or operated outside its usual range. Also document the specific controls and procedures used during each mode to identify gaps in existing safeguards.

15. Who should confirm that the information is current?

Assign document owners and involve personnel who understand the process and procedures. Engineering and maintenance staff can check different records. Record each document's revision date and verifier.